One way of explaining inconsistencies in human belief and behaviour is to model us as having multiple minds which rarely interact directly. Each set of views and pattern of thinking are brought to the fore by different kinds of questions and different ways of framing these questions. Here is a detailed post on the idea of near-far bias. Because I refer to near-far bias so often, I thought it was worth creating a post with a simple picture to refer to showing the traits which prime either way of thinking. It is from Robin Hanson’s new presentation We Don’t Donate to the Future: Do We Care.
Popular posts
Hi! I am a young Australian man ostensibly interested in the truth and maximising the total number of preferences that are ever satisfied, weighted by their intensity. I also enjoy reading and writing about the topics listed above. If you share my interests, friend me on ,
, or
or subscribe to my RSS feed .
All opinions expressed here are at most mine alone, and have nothing to do with any past, present, future or far future employers.
Some popular posts:
The lives you could have saved
How feasible is a ‘charter city of refugees’ in Australia?
NEWS FLASH: multiverse theory proven right
Choosing the best status games for society
Eat cows to save mice? Hold your horses!
Beeminding your way to greatness
Should you floss: a cost benefit analysis
What should we do about wilderness?
Twitter Updates
- If People Could Immigrate Anywhere, Would Poverty Be Eliminated? - Shaun Raviv - The Atlantic theatlantic.com/international/… 3 weeks ago
- RT @givingwhatwecan: New blog post: Is it Good to Campaign for Increased Government Aid to Cost-Effective Interventions? http://t.co/b1g ... 1 month ago
- RT @GabrielRossman: Never bring a t-test to a moral intuition fight 1 month ago
- RT @ChristophHewett: .@PeterSinger Effective altruism is vital to get good things done. Signed up to 80000 hours based on the talk summa ... 2 months ago
- RT @matingmind: Legalize polygyny for tech billionaires. #fivewordTEDtalks #standingovation 2 months ago
- Anyone read this? The Theory That Would Not Die by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne f... audible.co.uk/pd?asin=B007P5… #Audiobook via @audibleuk 2 months ago


1 comment
Comments feed for this article
March 30, 2010 at 11:23 pm
Jim
This is remarkably similar to my Introspective/Extrospective spectrum.